1st May 2011 – He scores against Manchester United
Osama Bin Laden dies the next day

19th October 2011 – He scores against Marseilles
Gadaffi dies the next day

11th Feb 2012 – Scores against Sunderland
Whitney Houston dies (dies the next day if in UK time)

Whos next

TWO young lovers were toasting a £45million lottery win last night — two weeks after a £40million jackpot was claimed by a couple just 20 miles away.

Inb4 one of them runs off with someone else.

do they copy american slang like in the UK?

Now lets take Canada or the UK for examples which have a public news organization such as the BBC or the CBC, which report accurately on most issues and get public money.

America y u no have a publicly funded news organization?

brb free market will fix healthcare (ya ok…)
brb free market will fix incentive to go to war (lol ok)

I lift for around 1-1.5 hours, 4 days a week. I play squash for 1 hour 3 times a week. Aside from the walking to and from campus, the rest of my life is relatively sedentary, as I am mostly in school studying. Aside from squash/lifting, I probably average around 5k walking a day.

According to the mifflin-st jeor equation, my bmr is around 1660. This seems relatively close the schofield equation, which uses specific age categories ( i am under 19-30), which calculates my bmr at around 1640. no worries.

However, what im concerned about are the conflicting activity levels in different sources. Given a rough estimate, I think I am between lightly-moderatly active. On these stickies, and most ofther non-scientific reports (e.g. livestrong, ehow, etc) this corresponds to around 1.4-1.5 PAL. However, in caloric rdas for many countries, and the fao, and most scholarly articles, this is a PAL of around 1.7.

Here is my evidence: (please remove spaces from urls as i have a too low post count)

http :/ /www . fao. org / docrep/007/y5686e/y5686e07. htm #bm 07.2

http : //www . sacn . gov . uk/ reports_position_statements/reports/sacn_dietary_recommendations_for_energy_report . html ( this report states the average PAL for british adults is 1.63, corresponds to quite active in the stickies. Also, apparently the lowest PAL sustainable for long term health is 1.38, which is still ‘lightly active’.)

http :/ / www .nrv. gov. au /energy . htm ” PAL ranges from 1.2 (bed rest) to 2.2 (very active or heavy occupational work). PALs of 1.75 and above are consistent with good health. PALs below 1.4 are incompatible with moving around freely or earning a living. PALs above 2.5 are difficult to maintain for long periods"

In my experience based on what I have read, these articles may be more accurate since most people without a bodybugg seem to have previosuly underate, probably to innaccruate calculations.

This is is probably quite important, not only for me, as a calorie difference of up to 500 could mean the difference between maintainence and a full out bulk.

Hope others could chime in on this topic, thanks